మాట మాట్లాడితే రాజ్యాంగం అనే మీరు రాజ్యాంగ బద్ధంగా మేం తెలంగాణా రాష్ట్రం అడిగినప్పుడు మనస్పూర్తిగా సహకారం ఇస్తరని ఆశపడ్డం. మీరు మాత్రం మొఖం చాటేసిన్రు. పాత్రికేయులు మొఖం పట్టుకొని అడిగినా కూడా సరిగ్గా సమాధానం చెప్పలే.
చిన్న రాష్ట్రాలకు మీ పార్టీ అనుకూలం అని చెప్పుతరు. చిన్న రాష్ట్రాలతోటే అధికార వికేంద్రీకరణ వలన అభివృద్ధి జరుగుతది అని చెప్తరు. మరి తెలంగాణా విషయం వచ్చేసరికి అభివృద్ధికి రాష్ట్ర విభజనకి సంబంధం లేదంటరు. తెలంగాణా విషయం వచ్చే సరికి మీరు చెప్పే విషయాలు అర్థం గావు. తెలంగాణా గురించి మాట్లాడాలంటే రూజ్ వెల్ట్ గుర్తుకొస్తడు మీకు. కనీసం మీరు జెప్పే విషయాలు మీకయినా అర్థమైతున్నయా అని మాకు అనుమాన మైతుంది.
మొన్న అసెంబ్లీల ఇద్దరు ముగ్గురు తెలంగాణా ఎమ్మెల్యేలు రెచ్చి పోంగనే మీకు ప్రజాస్వామ్య సూత్రాలు గుర్తొచ్చినై. నిమిషాల మీద అసెంబ్లీ మీడియా పాయింటు దగ్గరికొచ్చి ఆవేశంగ ప్రసంగించిన్రు. ప్రజాస్వామ్యం ఖూనీ అయినట్టు బాధ పడ్డరు, ఆవేదన పడ్డరు. సరే, మీ ఆవేదనకు అర్థం ఉందనుకుందాం.
మరి శ్రీకృష్ణ కమిటీ 8వ చాప్టరు మీద హైకోర్టు తీర్పు ఇచ్చింది. ఆ చాప్టర్ల ప్రజాస్వామ్యాన్ని అపహాస్యం చేసే ఎన్నో విషయాలు బయట పెట్టింది. ప్రభుత్వం మీడియా మేనేజిమెంటు చెయ్యాలె అనుడు మీరు సమర్థిస్తరా? ప్రభుత్వం రాజకీయులకు పదవులు ఆశ పెట్టి ప్రజా ఉద్యమం నీరు గార్చాలె అని చెప్పుడు సమర్థిస్తరా? ఇంతవరకు దీనిమీద ఏమీ మాట్లాడక పోతిరి.
8వ అధ్యాయం ఆధికారికంగ బయట పెట్టినంక మాట్లాడుత అంటరేమో? రహస్యం గాబట్టి అది ఎప్పటికీ బయటకు రాదు, మీరు ఎప్పటికీ మాట్లాడరు. కాని హైకోర్టు తీర్పు ఇచ్చినంక, బయటికొచ్చే విషయాల మీద మీరు మాట్లాడితే తప్పుగాదు. న్యాయకోవిదుడు ప్రశాంతభూషణ్ అంతటివాడు ఆ చాప్టర్ మీద స్పందించిండు. అంతకన్నా మీకు ఎక్కువ న్యాయసూత్రాలు తెలుస్తయని అనుకోను.
మీరు ఐదు నిమిషాలు మాట్లాడితే దాంట్లే పదిసార్లు 'ప్రజాస్వామ్యం' అని పలుకుతరు. మరి ప్రభుత్వం రాష్ట్రానికి చెందిన ఒక పెద్ద సమస్య మీద నలభై కోట్ల ప్రజాధనం కర్చుపెట్టి శ్రీకృష్ణ కమిటీ అని ఒకటి పెట్టి, ఆ నివేదికల ఒక దరిద్రపు చాప్టరు పెట్టి, దాన్ని అమలు జరుపాలని చూస్తుంటే, ఒక ప్రజాస్వామ్య వాదిగ మీరు స్పందించ వలసిన బాధ్యతా లేదా? మీరు చాలా పెద్ద సార్లు, ఏదో, మాకు అర్థం గాక అడిగినం. కోపం దెచ్చుకోకుంట జర వివరంగ జెప్పున్రి సారూ.
if you haven't seen already..
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGeb42XSKnE
"JP asks PM to find an amicable solution to T-pblm even if it means to create a separate Telangana state instead of the ongoing hatred and animosity among people, but people should realize that this will no way solve the fundamental problems the state and country are facing right now."
Such a powder coating is common with every politician. When he could react in such a fashion about Assembly issue, why would he turn a blind eye on other similar issues?
ReplyDeleteIf you respect JP for his intellect and honesty then respect his views also. Understand the reason behind his views without bias. Else ask your friend about T. He will talk just the way you want. If you have already formed a view on an issue and dont want to think open mind then dont ask JP or anybody. Follow what KCR has says. Before asking JP, YOU OU people reply first on the allegations levelled against you. All of us know why you people dont like him.
ReplyDeleteమొన్న అసెంబ్లీల ఇద్దరు ముగ్గురు తెలంగాణా ఎమ్మెల్యేలు రెచ్చి పోంగనే మీకు ప్రజాస్వామ్య సూత్రాలు గుర్తొచ్చినై. నిమిషాల మీద అసెంబ్లీ మీడియా పాయింటు దగ్గరికొచ్చి ఆవేశంగ ప్రసంగించిన్రు. ప్రజాస్వామ్యం ఖూనీ అయినట్టు బాధ పడ్డరు, ఆవేదన పడ్డరు. సరే, మీ ఆవేదనకు అర్థం ఉందనుకుందాం. This paragraph itself shows how biased you are towards any unappreciated acts done by T-leaders. How could you expect a honest response from any other leader, though Chapter 8 was inappropriate in our constitution? Chapter 8 may have unfair things to clam down telangaana agitation, but such unfairness is rooted in the system itself all over the country just like bribing voters during elections to elect as a leader by the definition of democracy. Even politicians like KCR also likes such manipulations, just because he is the one who gets benefited most in such situations. Otherwise why does he often goes hibernation when the movement is running at its peak? and What right do you have to ask JP to react on chapter 8 so that you would love it? he is not a film star to please you with his emotions...
ReplyDeleteమీరు అనవసరంగా జెపి పట్ల గౌరవం ప్రదర్శిస్తున్నారు . చదువుకుని ఉద్యోగాలు చేసుకుంటున్న మధ్యతరగతి " మేధావులు " కొంతమందికి ఈయనంటే గౌరవం . ఏనాడు సమాజం లోని అట్టడుగువారి గూర్చి గానీ , దళితుల గూర్చి గానీ మాట్లాడింది గానీ , ఉద్యమాలు చేసింది గానీ లేదు . బహుశా జెపి లోని ఈ " సు " గుణమే మధ్యతరగతి మేధావులకి నచ్చి ఉండొచ్చు . ఇదంతా డబ్బున్న మారాజుల రాజకీయం . అయితే గియితే జెపి లగడపాటి మనిషి అవుతాడుగానీ .. తెలంగాణా వాదుల మనిషి ఎలా అవుతాడు ?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous @June 16, 2011 1:30 AM
ReplyDelete>>>Chapter 8 may have unfair things to clam down telangaana agitation, but such unfairness is rooted in the system itself all over the country
If he thinks it unfair, why would not he express the same at media point? Why was he so eager at other times?
@Suresh,
ReplyDeleteSince he is intellect and honest in some issues, does it mean that I should respect all his actions?
There is no relevance for KCR nor OU students here. If your JP or you can't answer my questions, just keep quite. OK?
I am not asking him to say what I want. I want him to react on the brutal 8th Chapter and its validity when it is an outcome of a respected committee.
రమణ గారు,
ReplyDeleteఅవినీతి, ప్రజాస్వామ్య విలువల పట్ల చిత్తశుధ్ధి కలిగిన నాయకునిగా నాకు జేపీ పై గౌరవం ఉండేది. అయితే ఆయన తెలంగాణా సమస్యపై చూపుతున్న సవతితల్లి ప్రేమకు, ఆయన చెప్పే సిధ్ధాంతాలకు పొంతన కుదిరినట్టు అనిపిస్తలేదు.
No wonder you see JP only through your lenses and start a blame game. He asked manmohan singh to create telangana state, do you conveniently ignore that?
ReplyDeleteOh, When and where?
ReplyDeleteBefore a TV channel with all 'if's and 'but's!!
For that matter, at one time CBN has also asked separate state, right?
We clearly know who is who and at times how they twist their tongues.
I wonder for your ignorance..I doubt whether you cared to see above video.
ReplyDeleteHe asked MMS to form telangana state in a face to face meeting(intha vidveshaalu periginappudu ekkuva kaalam kalisi vunchaleru, edo okarakamaina rajee formula evolve chesi state form cheseyyandi). This is a meeting that happened just a month ago for submission of draft of lokpal round table
Where you have seen ifs and buts.. you can please lend your lenses for us. Show me where CBN has categorically asked to form telangana state.
@Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteLet us reserve the topic of who is ignorant for a moment. JP Claims that he advised PM in favour of Separate Telangana. We don't know, nor we have any recording.
If he advised so, he must be in favour of T-separation. Then why wouldn't he publicly announce that? Why wouldn't he openly support the same? You may claim that the TV interview is an announcement. But at the same time he said many time in the same interview that the separation would not do any good. It is nothing less than CBN's two eyes policy, in fact more dangerous and more venomous.
T people are not fighting for Telangana for just killing time. There are concrete reasons. There have been agreements violated. There are injustices made. And this JP says it is nothing but their imaginations!
In fact he can help us better if he discloses his original samaikya face than speaking like this.
In case of CBN, during 2008 categorically sent a letter supporting formation of T-state to Pranabh. Ofcourse latter he violated his own policy and became a cat on a wall.
In my opinion JP is no different from Babu in case of T issue unless he expresses clearly that whether it is needed or not needed.
JP/LSP has declared their neutral stance several times before and after T-movement's peak. He is behaving exactly how a neutral person should be. You first say JP should declare his stance and if you are shown he did, you cry that it is not same as you thought.
ReplyDeleteIsn't there any difference if someone says to PM that there is no problem creating T-state in May 2011 and someone sends a letter in 2008?.
Your problem seems to be not with JP's stance but with JP opposing doing whatever you like in the name of T-movement. Why don't you put that face forward instead of beating around the bush. Otherwise it is more harmful to T-movement than babu's two eye policy or JP's neutral stance.
If few MLA's of Telangaanaa does some thing unparliamentary in assembly JP makes a hue and cry as if it was an end to the Parliamentary democracy.
ReplyDeleteIf 2000 police brutally attack Osmania University as if they are invading an enemy country and Continues beating students including girls throughout the night, JP keeps mum. He finds no issue with democracy.
If you consider this as his stand of being neutral, you have every liberty to think so, but you can not convince me.
If Telangana is denied of right share of its waters, its jobs he does not find any violations in democracy. Having a huge river in their backyard, if T people suffered with fluorosis denied of drinking water, he finds nothing violated in democracy and keeps being neutral.
If a man is beating another one, and the onlooker maintains neutrality, does it mean really being neutral?
Before alleging you should first know how others responded . Your problem is you found JP talked against excesses in T movement in december and started against and may not be your fault that you don't know what happened before
ReplyDeleteI can not now collect all the responses from JP and LSP on OU incident. but for example you can see their press statement.
http://news.loksatta.org/2010/02/publish-white-paper-on-funds-allocation_15.html
I also remind one point. Someone before said that giving press statement is not enough, JP should have visited OU at that time. But are there really chances that someone can enter OU at that time(what happened to nagam). you create a situation yourself that no one can extend support and later blame them that they have not given enough support. This is how T-movement is proceeding..
Some discussion happened in this blog about similar issue.
http://www.loksattasanjeevani.in/2011/02/blog-post.html
If a man is being neutral(also extending hand in whatever way he can) and you go and beat him and call him non-neutral whose fault is that?
What a caption!
ReplyDelete"Prajalu kattulu doosukuntunte prabhutvam chodyam choostondaa?"
Is that a support JP extending for T cause. It is not even being neutral. Was there any condemnation on the brutal police attack?
Asking for an enquiry? Doesn't JP knew how Govt enquiries are conducted?
You are trying to prove something of JP which is not there with him. He is a fully exposed bias. But he will definitely apply some sugar to his words otherwise the very ground on which he is in politics will be totally missed.
Finally, in none of the links given by you so far, I could only find his apathy over the injustices caused to Telangaana.
It is not very strange that you never find something good in JP because I doubt your real intentions are not what you write.
ReplyDeleteWhat is more that is done than an enquiry for OU incident?. What are the other demands that are asked by OU students themselves other than these in that incident. On other hand can you whole-heartedly say everything was correct on OU students part?.
As I said there are other instances of how JP/LSP reacted on various other incidents connected to T-movement, but I feel its waste of time to try to give it to you as you are already blinded by your own judgements.
I can also say the same thing, it is not very strange that you people would not try to find any rationale in T movement. Because the real intentions you have are, you are from the group who are reaping fruits out of Samaikya andhra. With that in mind, there is no wonder what ever is done by T activists are treated as incorrect.
ReplyDelete>>>What is more that is done than an enquiry for OU incident?
Why would JP gone into excesses on that fateful Governor's Address day? Wouldn't it be appropriate from him to appeal the speaker for an inquiry into the matter?
>>>can you whole-heartedly say everything was correct on OU students part?
Can you whole heartedly say the brutalities done by the police whole night that day are justified?
>>>I said there are other instances of how JP/LSP reacted
I have never seen one. May be they have reacted in step mother way!!!
When an intellect such as JP has joined in politics honest people from both telangana and andhra have welcomed the development and they voted for him. But when telangana issue came up his double standards have been exposed and that is is making telangana people irate.
ReplyDeleteHis report to SKC and the cooked up data in the report, his silence on SKC 8th chapter recommendations, violation of human rights in curbing the agitation in Telangana like OU incident, preemptive arrests before million march, his silence about seemandhra sponsored agitation and the property damage took place in that agitation, his selective harsh remarks only to criticise telangana agitation such as tank bond incident all show his double standards.
Also now people got aware that he never had courage to talk openly about the corruption and ill-wealth gotten by Jagan and Chandrababu but he gets voice only on TRS.
We welcome criticism when some thing wrong has been done either side, but selective criticism has no buyers.
Vishwaroop garu,
ReplyDeleteNicely summed up! I am translating this and putting as a new post.
We can understand that he has his own problems in dealing with Telangana as he hails from Andhra but represents telangana, but problem is these kind of pseudo intellects can do more damage than thousand Lagadapatis.
ReplyDelete